Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nisabdham

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:37, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nisabdham

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. Fails WP:NFF. There's some nebulous claim elsewhere (I can't find the source again) that the film is in post, but there are no reliable sources to support it that I can find. —/Mendaliv/^2¢/_Δ's/ 09:59, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 14:21, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 14:21, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Alts:

type:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

filmmaker:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

producer:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

star:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:INDAFD: "Michael Arun" "Ajay" "Abhinaya"

Delete for currently failing WP:NF. Lack of suitable sources kinda dooms this article. If they become available, the topic can always be reconsidered. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 22:28, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for now. Mr RD 08:38, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.