Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ninja (software)
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 20:04, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Ninja (software) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No assertion of notability per WP:GNG or WP:PRODUCT, and no significant coverage online from WP:Reliable sources. Proposed deletion contested without comment by article's creator. Captain Conundrum (talk) 06:50, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Captain Conundrum (talk) 06:51, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Theopolisme (talk) 02:03, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar · · 03:58, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I had a go at finding sources and didn't come up with anything reliable. The project doesn't seem to have attracted any attention from the tech press. —Psychonaut (talk) 15:11, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete major lack of reliable sources Dusti*poke* 19:36, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.