Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nikol Svantnerova

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Esquivalience ^t 00:22, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nikol Svantnerova

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:GNG, only known from WP:ONEEVENT. No sources conform WP:RS. The Banner talk 21:27, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Czech Republic-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:53, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:53, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and rename to Nikol Švantnerová, which is her real name. Česká miss is a notable annual competition and the winner usualy becomes a "celebrity" or public personality. Reliable source do exist: [1], [2], [3]. --Vejvančický (talk / contribs) 08:25, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Participating in one notable event does not make a participant notable, as notability is not inherited. The Banner talk 10:25, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps not, but winning it, and going on to take part in another one is a different case. Typically winners of this contest receive year-round press coverage, which is ample for WP:GNG. So that's the three arguments in the nomination put to bed. C 679 16:53, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as sufficient reliable third party sources ([4], [5], [6], [7], etc.) exist to push subject across the verifiability and notability thresholds. - Dravecky (talk) 21:23, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per my comments above. C 679 07:32, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep As per Dravecky and the sources he noted. WordSeventeen (talk) 08:43, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.