Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nikki Shah

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 18:26, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nikki Shah

Nikki Shah (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NACTOR due in large part due to a lack of significant coverage in reliable sources of her roles. While the majority of her filmography is in notable productions, How to Be Indie is the only one where she had a non-minor role. For the others she is either not mentioned at all or had minor roles.

My before search turned up results such as Sidney Morning Herald interviewing a "Nikki Shah" about grief, a CBS article about a local fitness studio, and an article about tennis. These are all merely passing mentions or interviews, but I believe there is a high probability that these are merely false positive hits about others with the same name. TheSandDoctor ^Talk 14:36, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. TheSandDoctor ^Talk 14:36, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. TheSandDoctor ^Talk 14:36, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Wikipedia needs to stop being an IMDb mirror. Nothing actually shows that the mentioned articles are about this person, but even if they were they would in no way add towards notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:05, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete/Draftify I would consider interviews in WP:RS/WP:IS to count towards WP:SIGCOV for the purpose of WP:GNG. But I agree with nom that the SMH interview appears to be a false positive. Overall, the subject fails WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR. As with all living and young/working folks, I prefer draftification to deletion. — Ad Meliora ^Talk∕_Contribs 20:40, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.