Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nikk hope
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete CSD G11, qualifies as spam even if article is a hoax -- Samir धर्म 06:29, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Obvious hoax. ghits: [1] NMChico24 23:59, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete per WP:CSD-G11 and A7. Accurizer 00:06, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm not sure if A7 applies because the author does assert notability, however dubious, by claiming to have released hits with notable artists. That's why I chose to do AFD instead of speedy. --NMChico24 00:10, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- That's correct. Unfortunately, Hoax, no matter how obvious, is not a speedy category. He claims to be a sucessful record producer. He's lying, but the claim is there. Fan-1967 00:17, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm not sure if A7 applies because the author does assert notability, however dubious, by claiming to have released hits with notable artists. That's why I chose to do AFD instead of speedy. --NMChico24 00:10, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as quickly as possible, for obvious reasons. If the author removes the AFD tags one more time, ban him. Fan-1967 00:09, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete abvious "hoax" and even if it was true, just that does not qualify for inclusion. Cbrown1023 00:48, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom and above. Hoax, not to mention it doesn't fit manual of style...but that's beside the point. DoomsDay349 Happy Halloween! 01:23, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Obvious hoax. EvilCouch 01:25, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete He is currently working with Simon Cowell? ςפקιДИτς ☺ ☻ 01:36, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete as it fails WP:CSD#G1. --Brad Beattie (talk) 01:42, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Quite frankly horrific self promotion wtfunkymonkey 01:46, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete as G11, spam. —Caesura(t) 01:47, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - editor is being abusive with these "articles", plain and simple. My Alt Account 01:58, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete vanispamcruftisement. Danny Lilithborne 02:24, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete Hoax. - jlao 04 02:57, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete NN vanity spam --Steve 03:12, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete obvious hoax Green hornet 05:27, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.