Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Niki Cheong

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. NW (Talk) 01:56, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Niki Cheong

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable local columnist. Orange Mike | Talk 03:12, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Not in any way a notable writer. Qworty (talk) 03:21, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I can find some coverage of Niki Cheong, but only in The Star itself. I don't see coverage of him independent of the paper he works for. -- Atama頭 23:29, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No evidence of notability. Smartse (talk) 17:39, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Clearly fails WP:BIO ukexpat (talk) 18:40, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Response I'm not sure if I'm even typing this in accurately, as I am pretty unfamiliar with editing Wiki pages. I would just like to respond to the claims of going against Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, as well as conflict of interest (2 of the 3 "issues" identified). I would like to apologise for going against the policy. As a journalist I totally understand the need for objectivity in such material, except that when I was making the changes to my page, I was not aware of such policies, unfortunately, due to ignorance and unfamiliarity. I assumed I was making factual changes (and at parts fixing grammatical errors) - including the proper name and location of my former schools, correcting time references (with regards to the run), and some additional information to topics already covered - my role with RandomAlphabets, the beneficiary of Twestival and the year I completed my studies and title of my thesis. I will not comment on the questioning of my "notability" as it is not in my place to make that judgement. Thank you. Nikicheong (talk) 17:31, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.