Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nightlife in Leeds
Appearance
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Will undelete if anyone wants to transwiki. Mark Arsten (talk) 22:08, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Nightlife in Leeds
- Nightlife in Leeds (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
unreferenced for over 4 years. this article is really just a list of venues and all large cities would have "nightlife venues". there is no claim to Nightlife in Leeds being a notable topic worthy of its own article. LibStar (talk) 06:35, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Poor excuse for an advert and full of original research. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 06:57, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
*Delete. This unsourced article seems like an clear case of WP:NOTTRAVEL. Erpert Who is this guy? | Wanna talk about it? 07:13, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Transwiki to Wikivoyage. Seems like their scope, and they don't care much for references. Maybe they'll be able to work with that. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 07:22, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- I didn't even realize there was a such thing. That sounds like a good idea. Erpert Who is this guy? | Wanna talk about it? 15:45, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:03, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep There seem to be plenty of sources out there including: Nightlife Venues in Leeds; Bouncers: Violence and Governance in the Night-time Economy; Violence Between Young People in Night-time Leisure Zones; The Gentrification of Nightlife and the Right to the City; Urban Nightscapes: Youth Cultures, Pleasure Spaces and Corporate Power; Yorkshire and the Northeast; Divisions in the dark: youth cultures, transitions and segmented consumption spaces in the night-time economy; Theorising urban playscapes: producing, regulating and consuming youthful nightlife city spaces; The London of the North? Youth cultures, urban change and nightlife; A Social Necessity?: The Importance of Nightlife, Alcohol Consumption and Debt to Student Identity in Leeds; Producing nightlife in the new urban entertainment economy: corporatization, branding and market segmentation; &c. The claim that the topic is not notable is therefore false. Warden (talk) 17:49, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Transwiki -- I have no doubt there is plenty of info, but I do not think it is encyclopaedic in nature. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:45, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Transwiki -- I tried to put this up for deletion over 2 years ago, but I guess I didn't follow the right proceedure. I still say it should go, has no place on wikipedia, badly written off the top of someone's head, contains NO source references and I agree with the above commentator that it reads like a travelguide (and not a very good one at that). So that should be enough to see it go. It also has one of the most hilarious headers of any wikipedia article. Thanks for telling me Headingley and Chapel Allerton 'attract many people', that's so informative! Kaleeyed (talk) 10:25, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Relist comment The article creator appeared not to have been notified, so I've now done this. -- Trevj (talk) 11:07, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Trevj (talk) 11:04, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Wikivoyage It would probably work better than that. Perhaps aspects of it could be moved in with Tourism in Leeds. Mtaylor848 (talk) 12:24, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.