Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Niels G. Larsen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 05:59, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Niels G. Larsen

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability. Staglit (talk) 20:55, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Denmark-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:28, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:28, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:28, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:28, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails both WP:BIO and WP:GNG. My online search found no significant coverage of this individual (the results were dominated by Wikipedia mirror sites.). The two sources provided are spare of information and provide evidence only of Larsen's existence as a brewer -- but fail to support any significant claim of notability. — CactusWriter ^(talk) 17:11, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:49, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - The subject apparently had a nice career as a brewer. I don't see anything notable.--Rpclod (talk) 02:38, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - WP:BIO, no evidence of received significant coverage in multiple published reliable secondary sources. The sources given in the article mention the subject but do not cover the subject in a significant way. I searched highbeam and google and found no further sources. -- Taketa (talk) 07:59, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails GNG. No reliable third party sources found. No significant coverage on search engines. Jim Carter (from public cyber) 10:25, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.