Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Niedorajda

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Eddie891 Talk Work 20:57, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Niedorajda (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Stub article, non-notable film. Peter Ormond 💬 19:36, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:54, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:54, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep How, User:Peter Ormond is WP:NFO inclusionary criteria 3 not met? Good grief, it was also released in the USA, and I've added a reference reflecting that. Please withdraw this nomination. Nfitz (talk) 23:58, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak keep. I have trouble finding WP:SIGCOV here (in German?). [1] does have a two-three sentences discussion of reception (translated: The film was made exclusively for the performer of the main role, Adolf Dymsza. It was said that the piece had numerous disadvantages, but also a great advantage - the participation of an excellent comedy actor. The value of this picture also lies in the fact that he has good situational humor logically resulting from the action. An additional attraction of Niedorajda is the popular song by Dymsza "Co z toba Florek", composed by Henryk Wars to the words of Jerzy Jurandot.). The odds are there was SIGCOV in the Polish press of 1937. Would be good to check if the American premier got any coverage? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 04:57, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Notable enough to be released in the US, has sources.† Encyclopædius 09:56, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.