Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicor Gas

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. (non-admin closure) बिनोद थारू (talk) 02:17, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nicor Gas (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This topic is not meeting WP:CORPDEPTH, from my BEFORE investigation. बिनोद थारू (talk) 01:36, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Robert Kelter, Peace, Love, Competition. An Initial Look at the Restructuring of Illinois Residential Energy Markets, 33 Loy. U. Chi. L. J. 875 (2002) [1]
  • SEC Probes Accounting Problems at NICOR [2]
  • State regulators clamp down on Nicor Gas [3]
It seems this should be withdrawn. Failing that, it should be keep on the rule that decisions about notability depend on the existence of sources and not the state of sourcing in the article. Oblivy (talk) 02:04, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I agree to your comment. I misread the WP:CORP guideline as requiring notability beyond WP:SIGCOV but it turns out it's sufficient, as long as the sources are reliable (more strict reliability criteria though). I will withdrawn the nomination. बिनोद थारू (talk) 02:17, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.