Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicolas Heller

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 02:51, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nicolas Heller

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Instagram personality fails GNG, WP:NACTOR, WP:FILMMAKER Alexandermcnabb (talk) 10:56, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 10:56, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 10:56, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 11:08, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 11:09, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - the sources show significant coverage from reliable sources. Rogermx (talk) 02:15, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 01:24, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep: Subjects references do show notability. The nomination isn't clear or true, as for one, the subject is not an actor so WP:NACTOR does not apply, and two, the subject passes WP:GNG like the nomination said it didn't. As for WP:FILMMAKER, Heller does closely pass all of the criteria needed. Then again, per the nominations rather false arguments, it should be kept. Coreykai (talk) 14:26, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Added a few more sources as I found lots more info in Google. I believe this page is a weak draft and needs improvement. A few sources are in depth and all are from credible publications.Expertwikiguy (talk) 21:51, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Article needs some clean-up. Other than that, it's good enough to pass WP:FILMMAKER with reliable sources indicated there. ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 16:00, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.