Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicolás Atanes (2nd nomination)
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗plicit 00:02, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
AfDs for this article:
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Nicolás Atanes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
To fix a botched nomination by user @Tomaatje12::
- article already deleted 6 times on WP: es.
- a contributor has been blocked due to sockpuppeting activities
To my opinion, this is selfpromo/orchestrated promo by multiple people The Banner talk 14:32, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 15:10, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 15:11, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:BLP1E, although there is nothing here that can be qualified as a notable event. D.Lazard (talk) 15:30, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
- Comment Sources were provided in the previous AfD towards an argument for notability. XOR'easter (talk) 19:40, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
- No delete, I think it has enough notability to remain in Wikipedia. It has enough relevance. --Javiguardameta (talk) 08:53, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete This appears to have been a spam article on the es site which was either simplified or machine-translated into 11 different languages, likely in an attempt to advertise. Fails WP:PROMO, WP:NOTNEWS, WP:BLP1E. SportingFlyer T·C 12:50, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
- I wouldn't fault a sysop for deleting this under A7 or G11, but if an AfD is really needful, then I'd go with clear and obvious delete.—S Marshall T/C 13:16, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete, a teenage "activist" who fails WP:SIGCOV/WP:10YT. Geschichte (talk) 20:29, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.