Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nick Koudis (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:48, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nick Koudis (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NBIO. No reliable sources with significant coverage of the subject. Tails Wx 17:23, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Photography, Australia, and New York. Tails Wx 17:23, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. The page has the potential to meet GNG (given the subject is a photographer with 20+ years experience and this page seems pretty dated with little work since its creation in 2005--authored by the subject himself) but presently I don't see any WP:RSs. Cabrils (talk) 02:20, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 05:35, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per Cabrils. Appears to have been a promotional WP:AUTOBIO created during the earlier days of Wikipedia that has skated by for years despite not meeting notability standards. Best, GPL93 (talk) 18:26, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.