Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nextshark

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz ^Humbug! 15:29, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nextshark

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails to meet basic GNG. trivial coverage in Forbes. Saqib (talk) 07:27, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Cites from Complex, and New York Post, Quora.--A21sauce (talk) 19:14, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Why disagree? Quora is not a RS. Whereas NY Post and Complex only name checking the subject which is trivial mention. --Saqib (talk) 06:27, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Because I think toward the future and what is bubbling up instead of doubting everything about a country I might not like or don't understand. "Namecheck," uh, no. These sources rely on Nextshark as a source. Without it, they would have zero basis for articles?--A21sauce (talk) 01:22, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 08:37, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Delaware-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 08:37, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, among the refs given there are just 3 one line mentions, google and news showing nothing better. Szzuk (talk) 19:28, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Again, you're taking these "one line mentions" (manipulative language there by the way) out of context: These articles are intentionally short and to the point! They are not an obit of an unknown person in the back pages of a paper. Does anyone here have actual research skills? This shouldn't be left up to a question of one's tastes.--A21sauce (talk) 04:58, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment an IP editor has altered the AfD page link in the article and it no longer works. Szzuk (talk) 19:28, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed; they changed the capitalization to match the rest of the article, which unfortunately broke the links. ansh 666 00:22, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.