Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New York Summer Music Festival

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. – filelakeshoe (t / c)  13:24, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New York Summer Music Festival

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG with no indication on its notability or any sources. Shaded0 (talk) 18:12, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:47, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:49, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:49, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I tried to find sources, but there doesn't appear to be any significant independent coverage of this subject. Edgeweyes (talk) 20:50, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 02:19, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

~~Delete~~ Weak Delete. The only third-party mention I can find anywhere is this free listing on "summercamps.com" with no real information and a link to the program's now-defunct webpage. —Rutebega (talk) 05:26, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

My google-fu needs work, evidently. The local paper ran a pretty detailed piece about its closing. Notability is still debatable. —Rutebega (talk) 05:46, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, Notable and has been an important place for musicians in furthering their education and careers. I have done some work on it as well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Karl Twist (talk • contribs) 09:58, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting per expansion and new sources added to the article.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:40, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.