Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New York Academy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 00:25, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New York Academy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article written entirely based on unreliable non-independent sources. Also for being a for-profit organization it fails NSCHOOL, in which case the rule says "For-profit educational organizations and institutions are considered commercial organizations and must satisfy those criteria". The WP:BEFORE gave no independent RS that makes it pass WP:NCORP nor WP:SIGCOV. Chirota (talk) 23:40, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Chirota (talk) 23:40, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Chirota (talk) 23:40, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Chirota (talk) 23:40, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Chirota (talk) 23:40, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete does not meet minimum inclusion criteria of GNG. We really should stop treating non-profit schools more leniently for inclusion than for profit ones. We should start making both actually meet GNG and be covered in depth in multiple reliable, indepdent sources.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:21, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete due to lacking the multiple, independent, in-depth reliable sources this would need for it to pass either WP:GNG or WP:NORG. Since I couldn't find anything about it in a BEFORE. Likely the rather general name doesn't help, but that's not on Wikipedia and there probably aren't any usable sources anyway consider its a K-12 school. As they rarely (if ever) have good enough sourcing to be notable. --Adamant1 (talk) 21:09, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: as mentioned by others, clearly fails WP:GNGdefcon5 (talk) 07:43, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, Not enough coverage, fails WP:GNG .. Alex-h (talk) 11:59, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: coverage is weak and reliable sources not found. Fails GNG. TheDreamBoat (talk) 13:49, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.