Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Modernism

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:07, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New Modernism (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Admitted neologism. No evidence that the movement has more than one participant. Fails WP:GNG. LordVetinari (talk) 00:45, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Various writers over the years have seen fit to use the word "new" right before the word "modernism" for various reasons. However, I was not able to find any reliable, independent sources that discuss this specific artistic concept, which is really a form of original research that doesn't meet Wikipedia standards. Cullen328 (talk) 04:17, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:34, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per WP:OR, non-notable contrivance...Modernist (talk) 23:21, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, not a well-defined term, its meaning depends on the person using it. —Lowellian (reply) 11:26, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.