Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Breed (ECW)
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Merge to ECW Originals. Please discuss the final name of the merged article on Talk:ECW Originals. —Quarl (talk) 2007-03-05 09:31Z
- New_Breed_(ECW) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) - (View log)
Starting. See User talk:72.225.255.18. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 02:33, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep The New Breed is a legitimate, established heel stable that is part of the ECW Brand's biggest current storyline. They will run their course after a while, but so did Evolution, The 4 Horsemen and the nWo as well. Ohgltxg 00:25 28 February, 2007 (UTC)
- This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 15:39, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep They are a stable that is playing a major role in current ECW storylines. TJ Spyke 00:46, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep As per TJ & Ohgltxg. Inhumer 02:19, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge with ECW Originals - I still think it should be merged with ECW Originals, separately neither group is really notable and the articles are pretty close to mirrors of one another. Same story, different point of view.«»bd(talk stalk) 02:56, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The ECW Originals article can be expanded more since it is also the term used for any alumni of the original ECW. TJ Spyke 03:43, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- That seems, to me, like a small point. Aside from mentioning that fact and maybe listing the non-stable members there's not a lot to add in that respect to the article.«»bd(talk stalk) 14:56, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The ECW Originals article can be expanded more since it is also the term used for any alumni of the original ECW. TJ Spyke 03:43, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Merge I don't think this article is really needed, we should create a complete new article containing both maybe. Something like ECW Originals vs the New Breed and have all the information in one place like that. Just my opinion Govvy 12:33, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep As per TJ, Ohgltxg, and Inhumer.
fhb3—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.254.149.1 (talk • contribs) 13:02, 1 March 2007. - Delete ECW Originals, Merge with New Breed (ECW) - There needs to be a merger. Keep the New Breed name, since that's more of a stable than the ECW Originals. Mshake3 16:33, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Haven't been established for long enough. Seems like more of a loose association of performers at current. Mirrors ECW originals article in terms of storyline content. Without storyline content is just a list of names. The fact that they have had a big storyline for a couple of weeks doesn't really deserve Wikipedia immortalisation in my view. Suriel1981 17:45, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep The ECW Originals article wasn't tagged for deletion. Can't have one without the other. Ken S. 22:50, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Fan cruft. Manager Of Champions 05:31, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.