Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New America
Appearance
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to The Adventures of Captain Hatteras. There's no consensus to delete this article but I think the sources are still a little weak. I'm closing as "Merge" with no prejudice against keeping if stronger sources can be found (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:47, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- New America (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Doesn't seem to be a WP:Notable topic meriting an article. —Largo Plazo (talk) 21:45, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The island described by Jules Verne in his novel is hypothesized based on scientific knowledge at the time (1866). It is notable especially in that it foreshadows later claims to the existence of Crocker Land, Bradley Land, or other large Arctic islands. The novel includes detailed description of geographical features. I will expand the article with further information. Goustien (talk) 21:54, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to The Adventures of Captain Hatteras. This only seems to be notable in the context of the book, so, as the book article has plenty of room for more content, it would seem that the that would be the best place for this information. If any sources are offered in this AfD for coverage outside of Jules Verne's book then please treat this as a keep. Phil Bridger (talk) 23:03, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge per Phil Bridger jbolden1517Talk 06:13, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 00:02, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I have added sources, so I hope this will justify a keep per Phil Bridger. Goustien (talk) 05:21, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.