Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neumann International

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. In the absence of further comments, not worth a second relisting DGG ( talk ) 03:17, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Neumann International

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indications that this company meets relevant criteria for inclusion. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 13:27, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.

Delete. Yet another human resource consulting and executive search firm advertising on Wikipedia. Referenced to directories and internal sites. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 15:05, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. 2 notable facts about Neumann International: 1. It is the oldest and largest Austrian Executive Search firm (since 1971). 2. Neumann's CEO Serge Lamielle is Vice-Chairman of the Global Board and Chairman of the European Council of the AESC. Conrad.pramboeck (talk) 09:02, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment As the "oldest and largest" it should have received some significant coverage in independent press. If any can be found, that would really help. The association of the company's CEO with the company's representative industry group might be a fact to note in the article if it is allowed to stand, but hardly noteworthy in and of itself. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 09:45, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I have added another source which reports the company as the pioneer in the Eastern Bloc. Tomsterwik (talk) 07:41, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, v/r - T P 22:54, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.