Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nenskra Hydropower Project

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Nenskra hydro power plant. Content can be merged from history. Sandstein 12:35, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nenskra Hydropower Project

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article contains zero citations to reliable, independent sources; the "External Links" section only contains the websites of companies involved in the project. A Google search turns up several links, however, they seem to focus on the environmental impact of the dam, which is covered (albeit briefly) by Nenskra hydro power plant. The main purpose of this article appears to be to promote the project: the section titled "Environmental and Social Impact Assessment" only talks about how the impact "will be as low as possible", etc., and the rest seems to be an attempt to describe the benefits of the dam. The entire thing appears to be a soapbox, and probably shouldn't be here. ~ KN2731 {talk} 14:38, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:29, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:29, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Georgia (country)-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:29, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It appears to be a duplicate of Nenskra hydro power plant. Shall we simply redirect? There is an awful lot of content, perhaps some of it is worth transferring? Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:35, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I've placed merge to + from tags on the articles, accordingly. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:38, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.