Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NeedTo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 23:21, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

NeedTo

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article out of AFC. Subject fails WP:CORP - coverage is superficial or self-generated. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 08:19, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:53, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:53, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:53, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:46, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, only local coverage, no indication of wider notability. Huon (talk) 22:22, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep , Wider notability

http://www.myfoxhouston.com/clip/9461809/website-founder-describes-needtocom http://bizbeatblog.dallasnews.com/2012/04/dallas-native-wade-floyd-is.html/ http://www.s.co/blog/need-something-done-heres-your-answer http://www.thrillist.com/home-gadgets/nation/needto_jobs_services_websites

Users in over 260 cities — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:304:4FD8:1070:3422:925D:1DC3:58DA (talk) 00:54, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:31, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, looks okay to me. VegasCasinoKid (talk) 00:32, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"OK" how, exactly? §FreeRangeFrog^croak 01:24, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I don't see how this is anything more than an advertisement for a type of service offered by a million other web-based companies. This idea is neither new nor revolutionary, and this company fails WP:CORP, what exactly makes them notable? Because a few local news articles have been written? There simply isn't enough here to establish notability. -War wizard90 (talk) 05:35, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.