Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nedim Dedić

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain (talk) 01:22, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nedim Dedić

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

BLP of a data scientist with what looks to me like a pretty low Google Scholar count and not much else to support notability. I don’t think this passes WP:PROF. Mccapra (talk) 23:08, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 23:08, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 23:08, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 23:08, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Austria-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 23:08, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Tiny GS cites indicate little impact on his field yet. Try again in ten years time. Xxanthippe (talk) 01:38, 18 December 2020 (UTC).[reply]
Delete- as per nom. MrsSnoozyTurtle (talk) 09:22, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Citations not good enough in a high-citation field. Being a keynote speaker is suggestive, but not cause for notability itself. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:25, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Agree that the citations are low, but not only that there is also not significant news coverage. Expertwikiguy (talk) 09:33, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, Per Nom. does not satisfy WP:PROF. Alex-h (talk) 13:50, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom it may be WP:TOOSOON Spudlace (talk) 07:47, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.