Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Necroplasm

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Spawn (character). Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:41, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Necroplasm (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A search did not reveal any significant coverage as defined in the WP:GNG, which is needed to create a WP:VERIFIABLE article that is WP:NOT just an editor's WP:ORIGINALRESEARCH. Article does not meet most of our key policies and guidelines. Jontesta (talk) 16:26, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Jontesta (talk) 16:26, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge/redirect to Spawn (character). BD2412 T 21:37, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Spawn (character), where it is already briefly mentioned. A reasonable Redirect, but in no way independently notable enough to warrant a WP:SPLIT. The entire "Etymology" section appears to be entirely WP:OR, as well. Rorshacma (talk) 06:23, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete/redirect to Spawn (character). Topic does not meet the WP:GNG due to a lack of appropriate sources. Shooterwalker (talk) 14:19, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Spawn (character). Rubbish computer Ping me or leave a message on my talk page 17:09, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.