Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neall Ellis

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consensus is that the subject meets notability requirements. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 19:11, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Neall Ellis

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I believe that this person fails WP:SOLDIER. I don't see anything in his mercenary career that would make him notable IMO Gbawden (talk) 09:22, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per WP:GNG. Aside from the Independent, Cracked and ABC articles already listed, there are also a Telegraph article and a book. Clarityfiend (talk) 10:30, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per all of the above. Faceless Enemy (talk) 12:30, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per the above and the individual's significance to the conflict in Sierra Leone. --Katangais (talk) 21:53, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:26, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:27, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:27, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:27, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.