Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Navy Joan Roberts

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete‎. This is an article about a four year old child. We'd need pretty impressive souricng to ever keep such material. I'm satisfied the discussion to date finds this a BLP violation and fails the G10 criteria. BusterD (talk) 16:52, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Navy Joan Roberts

Navy Joan Roberts (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a four year old child who is not known for anything she has done. She is known only as the out of wedlock daughter of the then drug addicted son of the US president. This article’s purpose appears to be an effort to somehow embarrass her father and grandfather, with her as collateral damage. The subject matter is already covered in the Hunter Biden article and need not be covered in an additional article about the young child. Fails WP:G10 WP:A7 WP:NBIO WP:GNG. O3000, Ret. (talk) 13:55, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Politics. O3000, Ret. (talk) 13:55, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. So a four-year-old child is suddenly notable and shamed because of the circumstances of her birth? WP:BLP1E applies here. This is borderline child abuse. WWGB (talk) 14:08, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete This is an appalling attack on a child with her entire life ahead of her. Needs to be deleted right now. SPECIFICO talk 14:24, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Quick delete Utterly inappropriate BLP, and coverage would only be appropriate within her father's article. Reywas92Talk 14:34, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Could be a brief mention in a Hunter Biden biography here, not needing a whole article. Oaktree b (talk) 14:59, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Notability is WP:NOTINHERITED, almost all coverage of her is in relation to Hunter Biden or Joe Biden. WikiVirusC(talk) 15:01, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete ASAP - whether you like or dislike Hunter and Joe Biden, don't drag a little girl into this. --A. B. (talkcontribsglobal count) 16:19, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per NBASIC and INVALIDBIO. The subject is a minor who has received coverage as a subject to a parental dispute. There's no relevant content that couldn't theoretically be mentioned in father's bio instead. Trout to the nominator for assuming bad faith about the article's purpose and for invoking G10 and A7. Politrukki (talk) 16:35, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy Delete - and a trout to whoever created this page. This is totally inappropriate. What the fuck?— Isaidnoway (talk) 16:40, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.