Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Navnath Sampradaya

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge with Navnath into a single article, incorporating some of the sources listed at this AfD. From reading the articles, Navnath seems the appropriate target, but I encourage experts in the topic to assist with this. Fabrictramp | talk to me 21:39, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Navnath Sampradaya

Non notable, original research with no reliable sources. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 00:38, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. — Ism schism (talk) 00:44, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. — Ism schism (talk) 00:44, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep. This one boils down to whether the sources (which are plentiful and obviously third-party for the most part) can be considered reliable. --Blanchardb-^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}-timed 03:43, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep or Merge into Navnath. Reliable sources available: [1].--Redtigerxyz (talk) 05:37, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete my opinion is not enough reliable third party sources. Lillycottage (talk) 07:57, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep or Merge into Navnath. per Redtigerxyz. Some highly reliable sources.John Z (talk) 10:13, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge or Delete into Navnath as per above. No such thing outside of the subject of Navnath. Wikidās ॐ 17:34, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, merging with all the other related articles up for deletion. ~ priyanath talk 03:10, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. - House of Scandal (talk) 04:14, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with other related articles. Shobhit102 | talk 12:15, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.