Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Native American Indian Dog (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus seems clear, and the text article does not even suggest it knows precisely what its subject is. Drmies (talk) 03:16, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Native American Indian Dog

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable, dog was involved in one incident that was reported in local papers. There was a book written about the incident by the people involved but that's the only source i could find besides the news articles already cited and breeder sites. TKK ^{bark !} 23:02, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: per nom and per reasoning of the previous nomination—the reasons given are still valid now. הסרפד (call me Hasirpad) (formerly R——bo) 23:48, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organisms-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 15:56, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, but keep objective - I am the nominator from the previous AfD when this article was deleted. Invariably, it keeps getting recreated. Elf gave some good advice that I will quote here: ~Pesco^{So say•we all} 21:45, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep but make sure it's really neutral. In my vast (really) experience with wikipedia dog-breed articles is that, if there are people selling them by that name, the article will be recreated over and over. It's better to have the article and try to make sure that it clarifies as neutrally as possible that this is a developing breed, there might be only a couple of breeders doing it, that its legitimacy is still debatable, and cite ANY kinds of references that one can find. I do think that it's very hard to put info on the breed about its temperament, size, etc. when it's not even close to being a fully developed breed yet. Elf 23:18, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 15:56, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 15:56, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 15:56, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - The solution to repeated recreation is not to just allow it. If it isn't notable, then repeated recreation can be dealt with through salting. -- Whpq (talk) 16:55, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.