Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nathaniel Ru

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and redirect to Sweetgreen. the contents is too promotional to keep; the redirect is sufficient DGG ( talk ) 23:38, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nathaniel Ru

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Cannot see how the person has enough WP:RS to be notable. Baum des Lichtes (talk) 06:11, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a non-notable businessman.John Pack Lambert (talk) 06:08, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:09, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Music1201 ^talk 01:58, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep -Google results show Ru has got a lot of coverage in national publications such as New York Times, Bloomberg, FastCompany, Fortune and others. Those articles have info that aren't included in this article that could expand its detail. Burroughs'10 (talk) 20:39, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Sweetgreen. coverage is about them, not him. duffbeerforme (talk) 07:40, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: final relist — Music1201 ^talk 15:59, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Music1201 ^talk 15:59, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 15:46, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Close comment - I originally closed as No Consensus however after a notice on my TP I've realized Music1201's relist didn't actually relist at all (IE it was on the old AFD log and not todays) and I never checked the date when I closed it .... so I've relisted it, and (in the nicest possible way) Music1201's relist should be ignored aswell, So this is still a third relist, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 15:50, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Subject is covered significantly in reliable sources, the page just needs to be expanded. Meatsgains (talk) 15:57, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Sweetgreen. Otherwise, not notable for stand alone article. Kierzek (talk) 17:19, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Sweetgreen. KGirlTrucker81^{talk what I'm been doing} 22:04, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Sweetgreen. This is a classic BLP1E. The coverage is more about the company and it seems the individual is not independently notable. A redirect should suffice here. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 15:34, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.