Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nathan Furry

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. To answer Falcadore's question, strong modifiers to a keep or delete mean nothing at all when closing these things. A week modifier does, however, bear noticing, but the primary issue is strength of arguments, not "counting snouts". Courcelles (talk) 22:11, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nathan Furry

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No notability demonstrated. Grahame (talk) 08:44, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Grahame (talk) 08:47, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, minor party functionary and unsuccessful local government candidate. The Young Australian of the Year award is regional only and does not demonstrate notability in my opinion. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 11:26, 21 September 2015 (UTC).[reply]
strong delete obvious autobio created by a single purpose editor. None of the positions held confer notability. LibStar (talk) 13:04, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- comment: I'm curious to know what exactly a "strong" delete is. Does it serve any purpose beyond hyperbole? --Falcadore (talk) 05:43, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

you will sometimes also see people vote weak keep or delete. LibStar (talk) 08:17, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That is not an answer. You can't say we have "strongs" becease we have "weaks". That doesn't explain a thing. How does a strong delete differ from a delete? --Falcadore (talk) 08:58, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete autobiography of a non-notable person. Probably created for a future ballot to create notability Spoonalious (talk) 16:43, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No notable achievements, nor any notablity established for any positions held. --Falcadore (talk) 05:43, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:48, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:48, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.