Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Natalia Khoma

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep, withdrawn. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:59, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Natalia Khoma (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Looks like an advertisement. Do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Fails WP:GNG DMySon (talk) 10:11, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

*I Withdrawn this nomination after improving the article and added new references by Beccaynr. DMySon (talk) 15:41, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. DMySon (talk) 10:11, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. DMySon (talk) 10:11, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ukraine-related deletion discussions. DMySon (talk) 10:11, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:12, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Beccaynr (talk) 15:10, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep at minimum per WP:NMUSICOTHER; I am still working on adding sources from ProQuest, but per sources added to the article, she appears to be frequently covered in publications devoted to a notable music sub-culture, and per WP:NPROF, she has several honorary professorships in addition to her current role as an Associate Professor at the College of Charleston. On ProQuest, there are multiple reviews of her performances from a variety of independent and reliable sources that support WP:MUSICBIO#1 e.g. Reinthaler, Joan. "Boris Slutsky's Piano Poetry". The Washington Post, 21 Oct 1998: D08; Kristin E. Palmer "THREE STARS, ONE FINE SHOW". Anchorage Daily News. 19 Nov 1996: F.3.; PHILIP MUNGER "VIRTUOSOS EARN TITLE, AUDIENCE EARNS SCORN". Anchorage Daily News. 27 Sep 1995: F.1.; Haskell, Loretta. "Final Charleston Music Fest concert uplifting" The Post and Courier. 30 Mar 2009: A.2.; Hubbard, George. "Symphony's 'Women' delightful". The Post and Courier. 18 Feb 2007: A2.; and there is Review: Natalia Khoma commands Bach Cello Suites (Post and Courier, 2015), Music Review: National Symphony of Ukraine hits the right balance (Telegram & Gazette, 2020), as well as coverage that supports WP:MUSICBIO#9, Has won first, second or third place in a major music competition, e.g. Ashley, Dottie. "Bard's characters come to life" The Post and Courier. 21 Oct 2007: I2. (e.g. "A native of Ukraine, Khoma won top prizes at the All-Ukrainian Competition in 1981, the Budapest Pablo Casals Competition and the Belgrade International Cello Competition. She has performed with leading ensembles throughout the world."), Review: Bach cello suites get virtuoso treatment from Natalia Khoma (Post and Courier, 2013, "Among her accolades are wins at the Budapest Pablo Casals Competition (1985), the Tchaikovsky Competition in Moscow (1990) and the Belgrade International Cello Competition (1990)."). Beccaynr (talk) 17:53, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]