Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nandita Mahtani

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Please improve the article, though. Only two refs there right now. Tone 17:30, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nandita Mahtani (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It does not written per notability guideline, specially WP:ANYBIO. ~AntanO4task (talk) 10:17, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ~AntanO4task (talk) 10:17, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - Found a few sources: ^{[1][2][3][4][5][6]}

So IMHO notability is most certainly there, It's also worth noting Indian subjects don't get a lot of attention compared to say US/UK subjects so leniency is generally given too, Anyway meets GNG by a bare minimum. –Davey2010^Talk 12:19, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep given Davey2010's sources.--Mvqr (talk) 13:30, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete As per nom. Fails GNG. Priyanjali singh (talk) 14:41, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Priyanjali singh May I ask have you read any of the sources provided or have you simply !voted delete without even bothering to read them ?. –Davey2010^Talk 15:09, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 15:41, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 15:41, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 15:41, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - Per Daveys sources. Within WP:GNG.BabbaQ (talk) 18:53, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: Sources meet GNG. Although it should be a speedy delete based just on the statement that Johnny Depp has style.   // Timothy :: talk  07:39, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as per @Davey2010 work on sourcing, it seems that the subject passes WP:GNG. Roller26 (talk) 14:16, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.