Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nancy Rani

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 11:48, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nancy Rani

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is an unreleased film, and does not satisfy film notability. In particular, the guidelines on future films say that unreleased films are seldom notable, and this is no exception. (They are only notable if production itself has been notable.)

The article does not have a plot summary or a Reception section. A plot summary would not make it notable, and it cannot have a Reception section until it is released.

Google search on Nancy Rani shows that the film is in production, which we knew, and that there are women named Nancy Rani.

Of the three references, it appears that two are associated with the studio and one is a press release. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:03, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:03, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:03, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment This nomination appears twice in today’s listing. Mccapra (talk) 04:08, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment to User:Mccapra - I am not surprised. My first attempt to nominate it (with Twinkle) hung up halfway through, after tagging the article but not creating the deletion discussion page. So I reverted the tagging of the article and repeated the nomination. I apologize if I handled this clumsy situation clumsily. Robert McClenon (talk) 05:01, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I think I’ve had that happen to me too. Mccapra (talk) 05:05, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom due to concerns around WP:GNG and WP:NFILM Spiderone 19:17, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.