Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nancy Pili Hernandez

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 03:15, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nancy Pili Hernandez

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

First off its an orphan article, so its already a bad sign. Secondly, apart from hanging a banner saying "RESIST" near the White House along with other 6 activists, Nancy doesn't have any other notable event, as evidence of that, all of the references (except the ones regarding the banner) are either from her Linkedln profile, local newspapers and organizations and a episode from a small podcast.

About the banner, there's 6 references from 5 different newspapers, the only significant being the Los Angeles Times, and all the 6 news reports just briefly mention her name. Additionally the occurrence that brought her some media attention doesn't even have its own article. SadAttorney613 (talk) 01:02, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2021 December 14. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 01:16, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 01:23, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 01:23, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete would seem to be a bit-player in the activist activities. Oaktree b (talk) 05:31, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:20, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: alas. I was hoping someone would turn up something that would establish her notability, but no one has. The one piece in the Smithsonian can't hold up the whole thing. -- asilvering (talk) 19:54, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: the current news sources are not significant and I could not find any other info in Google. Caphadouk (talk) 19:56, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.