Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nancy Drew: The Creature of Kapu Cave
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Withdrawn by nominator after sources provided. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 21:08, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
Nancy Drew: The Creature of Kapu Cave
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Nancy Drew: The Creature of Kapu Cave (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No secondary sources in the article, and a BEFORE check yielded nearly nothing. Fails GNG. QuicoleJR (talk) 16:58, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. QuicoleJR (talk) 16:58, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
- Comment plenty of reviews according to MobyGames [1] + Detroit Free Press review [2] Timur9008 (talk) 17:12, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
- @Timur9008: Great! If there are no objections, I will cancel this nomination. Timur9008, could you please incorporate the above sources into the article? It would be very nice of you. QuicoleJR (talk) 17:32, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
- Done added 3 reviews + added source for the release date. Timur9008 (talk) 18:13, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
- @Timur9008: Great! If there are no objections, I will cancel this nomination. Timur9008, could you please incorporate the above sources into the article? It would be very nice of you. QuicoleJR (talk) 17:32, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Numerous sources demonstrated, clearly passes WP:GNG. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 22:24, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
- Keep: Seems the nominator intends to withdraw the nomination, but in the meantime, just want to emphasize that there are definitely enough reliable sources to pass WP:NVG. Nomader (talk) 15:34, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.