Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Namasteui

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. joe decker ^talk 02:37, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Namasteui

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Prodded because it fails WP:GNG. Article creator removed the PROD and all of the maintenance tags (and added a LinkedIn link). Based on this message, it looks like a blatant WP:COI issue, too. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 17:46, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 17:46, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I see no evidence that this online publication is notable. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 17:50, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:51, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:51, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

delete yet more spam Andy Dingley (talk) 17:02, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete per A7 (non-notable web content) and G11 (unambiguously promotional). —David Eppstein (talk) 17:37, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete notability not established. SJK (talk) 10:08, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.