Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nairsan (film)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Result was snowball keep. Ikip (talk) 15:54, 10 February 2009 (UTC) [non-admin closure.][reply]
Apparently fails future film notability guidelines. No prejudice towards recreation when reliable sources indicate that shooting has already begun. Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 09:42, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. —PC78 (talk) 17:10, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
*Delete, per WP:CRYSTAL. Although the subject of the film and one of the actors could establish notability, there are no valid sources for the information. §FreeRangeFrog 19:04, 6 February 2009 (UTC) Weak keep I think the author has established that his assertions in the article are valid. There's still the issue of WP:CRYSTAL being a bit soft around the edges in regards to films, but given the notability of the cast I think that can be ignored. And to the author - next time, please provide sources before your article goes into AfD and avoid the problem :) §FreeRangeFrog 18:45, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- There is a reliable source for it: The Hindu [http:In.movies.yahoo.com/news-detail/32924/Mohanlal-completes-thirty-years-in-filmdom-going-strong.html Shooting began]--Ultramegasuperstar (talk) 13:48, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Why do you not add that to the article, then? I recommended delete because I didn't see any sources in there. §FreeRangeFrog 17:42, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Sorry, I was not aware, that the article needs the sources at this point. I will include them asap. --Ultramegasuperstar (talk) 17:47, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I have updated the page. Please take a look. --Ultramegasuperstar (talk) 18:01, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as it is an important international movie for both Japan and India and per thehindu source. --Ultramegasuperstar (talk) 13:48, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete because, as pointed out, fails NFF. Source listed above does not confirm shooting has begun. Tool2Die4 (talk) 15:47, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- This editor has been indefinetly banned, so we can now close this AfD. Ikip (talk) 15:22, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per cursory search. Its gonna be another Jackie Chan film for goodness sake. However, it needs to be moved to Nair San so it will be easier to search and source. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 05:04, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- This should be discussed further, since the official website is just called "Nairsan" http://www.nairsan.com/. Thanks for your input. --Ultramegasuperstar (talk) 16:14, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't seen any evidence that this has started shooting - it's been six months since most of those links, too. Am I overlooking something? Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 16:27, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't see the point in your argument. Why should the shooting only last six months? Any reference for this timeframe? --Ultramegasuperstar (talk) 16:45, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't seen any evidence that this has started shooting - it's been six months since most of those links, too. Am I overlooking something? Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 16:27, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I have moved the page to Nair San for now. --Ultramegasuperstar (talk) 17:34, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- This should be discussed further, since the official website is just called "Nairsan" http://www.nairsan.com/. Thanks for your input. --Ultramegasuperstar (talk) 16:14, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Keep - It is confirmed that the shooting of the film has begun per[1]. C21Ktalk 22:21, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Superb find! "Although his character in the film required the use of several theatrical dialogues, Mohanlal says it took no extra effort on his part to deliver them." Past tense. Good job!! Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 00:30, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Withdraw nomination - as per better sources being found. Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 12:36, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.