Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naim Edge

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. MBisanz ^talk 04:19, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Naim Edge

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Source searches are only providing passing mentions; does not meet WP:CORPDEPTH. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:39, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:39, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:39, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:39, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've renamed the article Naim Records and added some additional material and citations. Headhitter (talk) 05:42, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:18, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per WP:HEY, I think the refs added, especially the Sound On Sound one which is rather in depth, should be enough to satisfy WP:GNG. – filelakeshoe (t / c)  22:44, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 11:35, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: if the final decision is not to keep this as a separate article, it should certainly be merged and redirected to Naim Audio rather than simply deleted, as the label was a spin-off from the very well-known maker of high-end audio equipment. Richard3120 (talk) 01:04, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.