Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naiga (musician)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 03:02, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Naiga (musician)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable musician. All indication is very very early career. scope_creep^Talk 16:14, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:28, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:28, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kenya-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:28, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:42, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, has enough sources and also is kinda notable Mausebru the Peruvian (talk, contibs) 22:04, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The sources are mostly primary, and the few secondary ones are not RS and/or sigcov enough to establish WP:GNG notability, and there's nothing to indicate WP:MUSICBIO either. Also, a promo/vanity piece by a SPA, with possible COI/UPE issues. --DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:24, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

*Keep by the sources of article, I think she passes notability per WP:MUSICBIO.Gravehoot (talk) 07:55, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Did somebody give you an order to come in vote on this morning. You know its not a voting system, its a discussion. SPA scope_creep^Talk 08:05, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I struck the comment above as it was made by a sock puppet now permanently blocked.4meter4 (talk) 03:18, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Article is primarily sourced to Spotify and other sources that lack independence. Not enough significant independent coverage to pass WP:SIGCOV or WP:MUSICBIO.4meter4 (talk) 03:20, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.