Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nadirim

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Killiondude (talk) 00:42, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nadirim

Nadirim (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

All sources listed are non-notable, save for potentially one. Can't see much through a Google search, which is troubling for a browser game released in 2011. Coin945 (talk) 10:38, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! Babymissfortune 12:36, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! Babymissfortune 12:40, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 10:19, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - All I could find was Review on MMORPG.com Lee Vilenski(talk) 13:20, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Optakeover(U)(T)(C) 16:02, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Virtually all of this article is in-universe material, except for an introduction that is largely a timeline of development. The article's primary author started and finished their involvement with the article while the game was in beta testing, and pretty much left Wikipedia after its official release. And the result of their work is what we have here today -- an article that serves little purpose other than to promote a now-closed game. NewYorkActuary (talk) 13:54, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.