Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NGO Fontana
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 20:58, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
- NGO Fontana (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This highly promotional article has been around for some time, but shouldn't be. The article fails WP:CORPDEPTH, as secondary source mentions are extremely limited ([1] and some passing references elsewhere). Half the links on their website don't work (like "About Us"). I also had to remove a substantial portion of the page which was copyvio from here agtx 17:41, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
- Delete I haven't found any RS that confer notability on this organisation. Fails WP:ORG. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kudpung (talk • contribs)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.