Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NEUA (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 03:53, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

NEUA

Survived an AFD over a year ago despite not having any sources: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NEUA. Still no reliable sources covering this so it fails WP:V. Delete as nn organization. Wickethewok 20:13, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep content is all verifiable with a copy of this book.  ALKIVAR™ 22:31, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, what's wrong with the sources? It's a decent stub. bbx 04:24, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• keep please per alkivar this is verifiable and notable too Yuckfoo 02:44, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.