Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mystery Science (company)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 10:28, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mystery Science (company) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a company that produces educational materials. The main claim to significance is that its materials are used in most US elementary schools, but I can only find this claim on their own website. Mccapra (talk) 07:53, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 07:53, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 07:53, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 07:53, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: If there was a reference to the Elementary School curriculum in the 50 states, this article could be saved. As it is, everything stands alone sans notability. Delete. --Whiteguru (talk) 10:36, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete This seems like a pretty run of the company that clearly fails WP:GNG and WP:NORG due to a lack of notability. Plus, there's obvious COI editing issues. So, I think deleting the article is the best thing to do. --Adamant1 (talk) 22:46, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep meets WP:GNG and is covered in a variety of reliable sources like Tech Crunch, University of Michigan, and Venture Beat.--Prisencolin (talk) 23:16, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • GNG is not the appropriate guideline for companies/organizations - NCORP is appropriate and is stricter than GNG. HighKing⁺⁺ 18:30, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete I am unable to locate any significant coverage with in-depth information on the company and containing independent content, references to date fail the criteria for establishing notability, topic therefore fails WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 18:30, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.