Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/My Lucknow My Pride

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Lucknow#Media. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:48, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

My Lucknow My Pride (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:45, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:46, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep This mobile app has received significant coverage in multiple, secondary sources which are independent of the subject (see the 3 refs given in the source, and there are many more). So it meets WP:GNG. --Skr15081997 (talk) 08:59, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Do we have an article for, say, tourism in Lucknow? This looks like utter trivia to me and would do even if it had 100 sources. Surely, one sentence in a larger article would be more appropriate, along with a redirect. - Sitush (talk) 09:02, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge to Lucknow per WP:PRODUCT: Topic seems to be notable, but it is such a trivial one to have a standalone piece for. It should also be noted that almost all of the coverage is related to the launch of mobile-app, there is nothing about else. So it could very well be argued to be a case of one-event notability. It should better be merged with parent article and a sentence or two can be easily inserted somewhere in there. Anup [Talk] 15:11, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 18:04, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Non-notable app. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 08:00, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete (no need to merge/redirect) This is patent WP:NOTNEWS. An app was launched but the coverage is only about the launch and nothing else. If we go by WP:WEIGHT, this would find no mention even in a page like Lucknow. My suggestion here is to delete this with no need for a merge/redirect. (An extra redirect hanging around uselessly is an extra page to patrol). If this receives a bit more coverage in the future, someone can add a sentence to the Lucknow article and the searching engine crawlers will do the rest of the job. But right now there is no such need. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 08:03, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge/Redirect to Lucknow § Media. This mobile app was launched by the city government of Lucknow, in efforts to preserve "the cultural heritage of Lucknow" and encourage tourism. As such, a mention at the Lucknow article is in order and of value to Wikipedia's readers. Here are some sources too: [1], [2], [3], [4]. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:40, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge/Redirect to Lucknow#Media per above sound analysis. I don't see the point in denying the merging of one line which actually received some reliable coverage (the argument that "a redirect is an extra page to patrol" is just too silly to be taken into account). Cavarrone 08:35, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.