Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MyPustak

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:24, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

MyPustak

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is not suitable and do not adhere to various Wikipedia policies. It should be deleted. Press coverage is not substantial. Light2021 (talk) 16:13, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As per WP:CORP, this article is suitable for organization category. See my justification on talk page. --Gelato7311 (talk) 10:00, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 16:53, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 16:53, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 16:53, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- corporate spam & no indications of notability or significance. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:03, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Tentative delete - As discussed on the article's talk page, I have many doubts about the quality of sources, but do not read Hindi. Grayfell (talk) 08:22, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton | ^Talk 23:19, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Having read the exchanges between User:Grayfell and User:Gelato7311 on the article Talk page and also sought other sources using the Wikiproject India search tool, I am not seeing anything better than the usual start-up coverage. (Nor - noting the frequent updates to the site's Alexa ranking in the article - does a position around 24,000th in the site's own market indicate more.) Moving to draft could be an option, but perhaps only if there was a realistic prospect of solid evidence of notability being attained in the near future, as per WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:GNG, but nothing indicates that to be likely. AllyD (talk) 07:11, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Very unfortunate to see that how a team full on non-hindi (Hindi is a language of 260 million Native speakers) people decided that hindi articles have no significant coverage for MyPustak. Anyways, It was my first attempt on Wikipedia and I wrote about a genuine organization with all possible information I could gather from internet. Accepting this deletion as I have no choice. --Gelato7311 (talk) 20:34, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]