Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muneesh Sappel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 21:44, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Muneesh Sappel

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An apparent vanity project (the article creator has the same name as the subject). All six sources at present are unsuitable. Pax 10:44, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

*Delete: Per rule, "people are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject." The subject does not establish the notability. Google search does not support notability except couple of trivial news items.Justice007 (talk) 12:11, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Go read WP:ANYBIO... the GNG is not the only "rule". Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 01:02, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

and WP:INDAFD: Muneesh Sappel

keep as while yes PAX & Justice007, the current article has issues, his wining of multiple notable awards meets WP:ANYBIO and proper sources for improvements are available. We then simply instruct author of WP:COI and suggest that he edit some other article. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 00:56, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I nominated this based upon a seemingly reasonable request. If the AfD results in article-improvement and/or clarification as to the notability merits of various Indian awards (thereby generating lots of Keep !votes), then all is for the good. Pax 21:11, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fine, and I will try to do something about it even though WP:NOTCLEANUP.Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 09:35, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:23, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:23, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep-Granted I never heard of this guy till now, but he looks to be quite notable in India just seeing the awards he has won! Wgolf (talk) 19:45, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment-though there is a COI with the creator of the page and the article. Wgolf (talk) 19:47, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I chose to judge the topic, not the article's author... which is specifically why I suggested above "instruct author of WP:COI and suggest that he edit some other article". Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 09:35, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Awards demonstrate notability, I have cleaned up article per NPOV. Justice007 (talk) 21:09, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.