Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muhammad Athar Qureshi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:10, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Muhammad Athar Qureshi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:GNG Jenyire2 20:43, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Jenyire2 20:43, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:02, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: This is an WP:NPOL pass. Pakistan is a federal republic and Sindh is one of the regional administrative units that NPOL refers to when it grants notability to "Politicians and judges who have held international, national, or (for countries with federal or similar systems of government) state/province–wide office, or have been members of legislative bodies at those levels". Sources establishing that Muhammad Athar Qureshi was a member of the Sindh legislative assembly are easy to find. And articles, including in-depth ones, about his assassination are easy enough to find that there should be no verifiability concerns. - Astrophobe (talk) 23:37, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Per Astrophobe, he has presumed notability under WP:NPOL. - Tristan Surtel (talk) 22:17, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep elected representative of a legislative body, passes NPOL. --Goldsztajn (talk) 11:04, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Elected member of a provincial assembly - Sindh Assembly (1985 - 1988). Easily passes WP:NPOL after Goldsztajn added new references and cleaned up the article.Ngrewal1 (talk) 16:45, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.