Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muhammad Ali Mirza

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. – Joe (talk) 09:49, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Muhammad Ali Mirza

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is no specific WP:SIGCOV, and no in-depth coverage. There is routine coverage. Which clearly fails WP:GNG. He is a common youtuber, just known for his controversial statements. Youknowwhoistheman (talk) 06:49, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Islam, Pakistan, and Punjab. Youknowwhoistheman (talk) 06:49, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Agree Hammad (talk) 11:44, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I will reserve a !vote for now but this and this doesn't look like some ROTM coverage. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 12:14, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep meets WP:SIGCOV as we have in-depth coverage in at least two publications, i.e. BBC Urdu ([1], [2]) and Independent Urdu ([3]). Further references in Dawn ([4], [5], [6]). Some analysis of his work here ([7]). He is controversial like Martin Luther was during his lifetime which is ok. 2400:ADC7:5104:D400:6520:B74E:4354:AD86 (talk) 12:50, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: The sources provided by Saqib meet WP:SIGCOV standards, with extensive reporting about him, sometimes due to his controversial statements and attempts on his life. If he is not notable, why is there so much coverage about him? Sources like BBC Urdu, as well as Indian and Pakistani news sites, report about him. In my POV the subject meets WP:GNG and the article should be kept. Minor portion of the article which are from non reliable sources can be removed. GrabUp - Talk 12:54, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

He is not a common YouTuber, He is a Daee and he has done alot of work for the revival of the actual Islam in Pakistan! Ahmad2411 (talk) 01:44, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete He is just an ordinary Pakistani YouTuber. The reliable sources such as Dawn, BBC Urdu e.g. primarily only focuses on Mirza's arrest whereas nearly the entire article is relying on poor sources such as "MM News", "The Namal", "The Pakistan Frontier", News18 Hindi e.g. Leithiani (talk) 20:22, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Changing my vote to Keep as I revised the sources and he seems to be a well-established YouTuber. Leithiani (talk) 13:04, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Leithiani: News18 Hindi a poor source? GrabUp - Talk 03:30, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Grabup, Of course, this is what happens when 4 days old accounts with a mere 300 edits participate in AFDs. By the way, did I forget to mention? Keep based on the coverage I provided above. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 06:47, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.