Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mr. Pete

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 12:19, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mr. Pete (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No coverage outside of industry publications. Does not appear to be notable. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 21:59, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 21:59, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 21:59, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:21, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:21, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nevada-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:21, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Entertainment-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:21, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:21, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions.CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:16, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete a non-notable entertainer lacking enough sourcing to pass GNG.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:29, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Doesn't pass GNG.ErieSwiftByrd (talk) 01:37, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom fails WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 11:06, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.