Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Montu Saini

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) KCVelaga (talk) 05:07, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Montu Saini (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article is a mishmash of names of people basically unrelated to the subject other than having (allegedly) been at his table once. No in depth sources required to establish notability under WP:GNG or WP:BIO. The Huffington Post India piece is fluff; not in-depth RS; the Economic Times slideshow ditto. ☆ Bri (talk) 19:49, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:41, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. The man is a presidential chef in a developing country, we can't demand a hard hitting New York Times expose on whether or not his chickens are free range. Sources that there are among India's best. Besides Huffington Post and Economic Times, we have non trivial pieces about him from Sommelier India [1], Times of India [2], and Scroll.in [3]. That meets WP:GNG perfectly fine. --GRuban (talk) 01:14, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:27, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:27, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep – Meets WP:BASIC per a review of available sources, such as those posted above by GRuban. Also, I view the Huffington Post article (link) as a valid, reliable source that that provides significant, comprehensive biographical coverage about the subject. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:27, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep I believe enough sources have been found to demonstrate notability. Spirit of Eagle (talk) 04:20, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.